No validating saxparser implementation available Foreign sex chat mobile no
almost three hundred were caused by this error alone.
(Few other parsers had that many failures at all; none had as many "false passes".) The exception is a Many of the documents which this processor accepted were documents which contained illegal XML characters, and so they should have caused fatal errors to be reported.
The bulk of the XML processors tested were non-validating ones.
For applications where enforcing the rules in a document type declaration is not necessary, a wide variety of choices and design tradeoffs is available.
Character references that expand to surrogate pairs are not accepted.
Oracle has a new version of their package, which appears promising.
But if you feed it illegal XML, it won't be good about telling you that anything was wrong; or exactly what was wrong.However, it is quite good at rejecting malformed documents for the correct reasons.Quite a lot of the documents that this rejects have XML declarations which aren't quite what the processor expects, in some cases seemingly due to having standalone declarations.(Were there not the example of the XML spec itself, and feedback from the XML editors on this issue, it would seem that this processor was in compliance.) Character references that would expand to Unicode surrogate pairs are inappropriately rejected.
Nobody has any real reason to use such pairs yet, so in practice this isn't a problem.For example, characters are rarely checked for being in the right ranges, saving code in several locations both to make those checks and to report the associated errors.