Interracial dating beliefs adult singles dating oak park georgia
Despite such censoring — or perhaps, because of it — it is vital that we thoroughly understand the topic, rather than passively accepting anything with which our unbelieving culture and media might try to inculcate us.Before venturing into the subject itself, it would be profitable to understand what others, especially Christians, have thought of miscegenation.Whatever the answer is, we must understand that it can lie along a continuum, rather than accepting the false dilemma that interracial marriage must be wrong in either circumstances.Any reasonably pious Christian will view the light of Scripture as the inerrant and perfect means by which we approach truth on any issue, and therefore he would presumably desire to know what the Bible has to say about the topic of interracial marriage.This clearly shows the historic opinion of Americans on the matter.
Is it really sensible to believe that, among all the radical changes in the social fabric of our nation heretofore, most of which have led to severe moral decadence, the changes associated with race and miscegenation have been moral ?
Similarly, Massachusetts forbade miscegenation by law in 1705, North Carolina in 1715, South Carolina in 1717, Delaware in 1721, Louisiana in 1724, and on and on.
Some states, which were formed later in America’s history, still had sufficient popular opinion to illegalize interracial marriage even into the twentieth century, e.g. In sum, over 40 states had laws forbidding the marriage of whites with non-whites (though not all laws prohibited marriages with every type of non-white).
I have in mind Muhammad Ali, the famous black boxer.
He clearly could not be accused of white supremacy for being against miscegenation.Yet, what is noteworthy here is the persistence of anti-miscegenation legislation for a very large portion of American history.