Bronze age oak coffin graves archaeology and dendro dating Free sex online chat no credit card
Results also showed no evidence for the use of organic dyes, thereby supporting the hypothesis that no dyestuffs were used in Nordic Bronze Age textile production.
These results challenge extant interpretations of Scandinavian Bronze Age textile provenance, and demonstrate the complexity of exchange networks in wool textiles during this period.
Some of the burials were looted in the Bronze Age, suggesting that less fortunate people sought the buried riches or that enemies wished to demolish the social identity and status of the deceased. "Radiocarbon Dating and the Chronology of Bronze Age Southern Scandinavia." In Absolute Chronology: Archaeological Europe 2500–500 BC. Then, copy and paste the text into your bibliography or works cited list.
The generally well-preserved state of the Jutish coffins and their contents can be explained with reference to chemical processes, which may have been broadly recognized and thus intentionally activated. Because each style has its own formatting nuances that evolve over time and not all information is available for every reference entry or article, cannot guarantee each citation it generates.
Holes in the bottom of each coffin point in the same direction, presumably aimed at leading water away from the buried person. a girl about sixteen years old was interred in the hollow of a 3-meter-long oak trunk at Egtved in south-central Jutland. "Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe." Journal of European Archaeology 5, no.
The fully dressed body was placed extended on the back, looking toward the rising sun and wrapped in a large oxhide.
To investigate the broader pattern of wool provenance, textile manufacturing and trade practices, strontium isotope and organic dye analyses were conducted on textiles from a variety of selected burial contexts.
In relative chronological terms the oak coffins belong to Nordic Bronze Age period II; a few belong to early period III.
All mounds in question have the same bipartite construction, with a waterlogged bluish and clayey core containing the coffin and a dry outer mantle of turf.
A thin, hard layer of iron pan always separated the two parts, sealing the coffin on all sides and thus hindering decay.
When the coffin was opened in 1921, the skeleton had deteriorated because of acidic conditions; however, the skin, nails, and hair were preserved.